STARPERY’s catalog is useful precisely because it shows how quickly a clean-looking product list becomes messy once revisions, construction options, old pages, and conflicting rosters are compared.
The current DJP canonical layer contains 36 body identities and 74 evidence-backed named head identities. Those totals describe the defensible structured slice in the corpus, not a claim that every historical STARPERY body or head has been captured.
Body identity and revisions
STARPERY commonly identifies bodies through height and cup/form language rather than one universal alphanumeric system.
Where first-party evidence distinguishes revisions, DJP Dolls preserves that distinction. The 171 cm D-cup old and new forms, for example, remain separate literal revision identities instead of being collapsed into one generic 171D row.
That matters because measurements, construction, option availability, or catalog status can change while the broad height/cup label still looks familiar.
Head identities
The canonical layer currently preserves 74 named head identities supported by first-party evidence.
That list is not presented as a historically closed master catalog. STARPERY’s current and archived surfaces do not provide enough evidence to prove that every older or regional head has been captured.
Names that look related are not automatically merged. Amy and Amy Large, for example, remain distinct where the manufacturer evidence presents them distinctly.
ROS and other constructions are not automatic new sculpt identities
STARPERY uses labels around head construction and ROS-related options that can make one sculpt appear in several configurations.
DJP Dolls separates the underlying named identity from construction where the evidence supports that interpretation. Hard, soft, ROS, and related option states do not automatically create a new canonical head name.
Likewise, a label such as Natalia ROS-2 does not become a separate sculpt identity merely because the construction/version text is different.
Conflicting ROS rosters
First-party STARPERY material has exposed conflicting ROS/head rosters across dates or surfaces.
Those conflicts are preserved rather than resolved by choosing whichever list is newest or easiest to parse. A current page can establish what was shown at a particular time without proving that an older roster was erroneous or that every omitted identity was discontinued.
This is one reason the public page avoids presenting a single timeless “all ROS heads” table until the evidence is strong enough to support one.
Current status is a dated question
STARPERY’s live shop, FAQ material, product pages, and older references do not always line up cleanly on whether a product is current, revised, available, or merely still indexed.
DJP Dolls therefore treats catalog status as dated evidence. A product disappearing from one navigation surface is not automatically labeled discontinued, and an old reachable page is not automatically described as currently orderable.
Bodies, torsos, male products, and materials
The research package captures female full-body identities along with torso and male-product evidence and distinguishes hybrid / full-silicone claims where first-party material supports them.
Manufacturer terminology around WR revisions, EVO/gear language, gel systems, RST, standing feet, and related options remains attributed. Marketing names are not converted into independent engineering conclusions without technical documentation.
The public-web pass also does not establish a complete body-level skeleton-generation matrix.
Compatibility
The corpus does not generate a speculative body/head compatibility matrix from appearance, retailer selectors, or isolated examples.
A known research caveat around the 151B family remains exactly that: a research caveat, not a universal public compatibility rule.
Exact compatibility claims need product-, revision-, and source-specific evidence before they are promoted.
Seller authorization is a separate verification layer
STARPERY currently tells buyers to use its official authorized-vendor list and says buyers can contact STARPERY directly when they are unsure about a site. Its buyer-warning page also identifies named sites that STARPERY says are not authorized resellers.
That is strong first-party evidence for seller authorization status when the current vendor page or a direct STARPERY response covers the exact seller/domain being checked.
It is not evidence that the seller owns STARPERY’s factory, shares a legal parent with STARPERY, or that every product-family/after-sales term is identical across every authorized seller.
Product authenticity has its own anti-fake check
STARPERY also operates an anti-fake code system for checking a physical product’s authenticity.
The current manufacturer page says the anti-fake code is only kept valid for 24 hours after its first query as a measure against duplicated codes.
That creates an important evidence boundary:
seller authorization and exact-unit authenticity are separate checks.
An authorized seller relationship does not replace the product’s anti-fake code. A valid anti-fake result does not prove that the seller’s service, fulfillment claim, or warranty explanation was good.
A current stock page can prove a specific listing state without proving the whole warehouse
STARPERY’s current Canada-stock Natalia example demonstrates the level of specificity DJP wants from an in stock claim.
The page identifies the exact body/head configuration, lists the visible included options, shows a quantity of one in stock, and separately distinguishes in-stock shipping from custom-made production/shipping timing.
That is useful listing-level fulfillment evidence.
It should not be generalized into all Canada-stock products are available, all stock units have the same options, or warehouse collection = physically dispatchable SKU.
For the cross-brand stock-state workflow, use In-Stock vs Custom vs Clearance / Factory-Second Dolls.
Factory photos are useful, but the camera is not a colorimeter
The same current stock/product page says website product images are taken with professional cameras while pre-shipment photos use mobile phones, and it warns that pixel/lighting differences can occur.
That supports a narrow but important buyer rule: factory photos are useful for visible configuration and relative appearance, but they are not calibrated proof that a skin tone or paint color will match a website image pixel-for-pixel.
Use How to Review Factory/QC Photos Before Your Doll Ships for the photo-approval workflow and How to Choose a Doll Skin Tone Online for the broader lighting/display problem.
Company and seller evidence
STARPERY publishes an official authorized-vendors surface and first-party commerce material, but seller authorization, warranty handling, and current policy details should still be dated when used in consumer guidance.
The public research also contains conflicting founding-language signals around 2019/2020. DJP Dolls does not flatten that into a single definitive founding date without stronger evidence.
Warranty, lead time, and commerce
The research recovered returns, cancellation-fee, shipping/DDP, production-window, discreet-packaging, after-sales, and affiliate information from first-party material.
Some timing and warranty questions remain unresolved or internally inconsistent. A fixed-duration warranty term was not established in the completed public-web pass, and production lead-time statements need reconciliation before they are used as current buying guidance.
That means the buyer-facing question should be more specific than does this have a warranty? Authorization, arrival-reporting deadlines, longer-term support, stock state, production time, and carrier transit are separate facts.
Known gaps
Important unresolved areas include a closed authoritative head/ROS list, a forever-closed body count, fixed-duration warranty language, reconciled production lead times and contact hours, primary Chinese registration/director evidence, named sculptors, a body-level skeleton matrix, same-SKU price data for deal ranking, packaging/unit confirmation, and media/image reuse permission.
Evidence note
This page summarizes the canonical STARPERY identity layer while preserving revision and roster conflicts. Separate manufacturer names, revisions, construction states, seller authorization, exact-unit anti-fake verification, fulfillment state, and unresolved policy timing remain separate so later evidence can improve the catalog without erasing what earlier first-party sources actually showed.
For the cross-brand workflow, see How to Verify Seller Authorization, Warranty, and After-Sales Terms, How to Review Factory/QC Photos Before Your Doll Ships, In-Stock vs Custom vs Clearance / Factory-Second Dolls, and How Sex Doll Shipping Actually Works.