Irontech Doll has one of the more information-rich catalogs in the current DJP corpus, but it is also a good demonstration of why a product database cannot treat every height, suffix, weight, and option checkbox as timeless truth.
The current canonical layer contains 23 Irontech body identities, 100 current-selector head identities, and 10 exact first-party presented combinations. Those records preserve literal manufacturer tokens and known conflicts rather than inventing universal meanings for every suffix.
Why revision context matters
Irontech publishes bodies under identities such as 158T, 160 Minus, 161M, 162 Plus, 164T, 166 2.0, 163 Minus, 158BA, and 164LN.
DJP Dolls keeps those tokens literal. A suffix appearing on one product is not automatically decoded into a universal factory taxonomy unless Irontech actually defines it.
That matters because the current research still does not establish authoritative global meanings for T, BA, LN, M, Plus, or Minus.
The same caution applies to revision language. 166 and 166 2.0 are not silently collapsed into one generic 166 cm body because their option and robotics evidence conflicts across sources and dates.
Canonical body layer
The current 23-body canonical set spans current silicone, Oriental, TPE, fuller-proportion, Young Series, and male/hybrid identities.
Examples include the Natural Optimized/current silicone group 158T, 160 Minus, 161, 161M, 162 Plus, 163, 164T, 165T, and 169, plus current tokens such as 153, 164, 165, 166 2.0, 167, and 168.
The corpus also keeps 151 Oriental, 163 Minus TPE, 164LN, 154 Young Series, 158BA, and separate male identities including 162 cm, 170 cm, and 176 cm configurations where the evidence supports them.
148 Plus / 148P remains unresolved because the current evidence does not establish one clean revision boundary. It is not forced into the canonical body set merely because the naming looks close.
Head identities
Irontech’s current selector research supports 100 canonical head identities.
That layer includes 55 female silicone identities, 30 female TPE identities, 10 coded male silicone identities (M1 through M10), and 5 named male TPE identities kept separate from same-name silicone heads.
The female TPE selector has a missing 75 gap. DJP Dolls does not invent a Head 75 just to make the sequence look tidy.
ROS and ROS MAX are treated as head constructions/options where the evidence supports them, not as automatic new sculpt identities. The preserved S40 ROS MAX selector conflict remains visible rather than being normalized away.
Exact combinations, not every possible selector pairing
The canonical layer contains 10 exact first-party presented body/head combinations.
A head appearing in a selector or being mechanically compatible with an interface can be useful compatibility evidence, but that does not mean every theoretical pairing should become a standalone model record.
The 162 Plus / Heidi name match, for example, was held until stronger code-level evidence could support an exact pairing rather than relying on a display-name match alone.
Weight is not one timeless number
Irontech is a strong example of why weight needs source and configuration context.
Across the preserved research, some bodies have manufacturer values, some have blank first-party fields, and some have different seller/community or lightweight/configuration-dependent numbers. DJP Dolls does not overwrite an unknown manufacturer field with a convenient secondary number.
Where a secondary weight is useful, it belongs in a source-scoped measurement profile with the configuration, date, and evidence class attached.
That approach also avoids treating lightweight construction, gel options, breast configuration, or later revisions as if they could never change the weight of a body carrying the same basic height token.
Plus, Minus, and other suffixes
Plus and Minus are preserved as literal manufacturer text. The current evidence does not justify turning them into a universal formula such as “Plus always means larger bust” or “Minus always means lightweight.”
The same rule applies to M, T, BA, and LN. A meaning supported in one narrow context is not automatically generalized across the full catalog.
One observed M / Minus relationship in the 161M context is not enough to define every M token everywhere.
Robotics and electric-option compatibility
Irontech publishes a growing electric / robotic product ecosystem, including research leads around Electric Hip/Waist systems and newer AI/electronics products.
Compatibility is where the current corpus deliberately stops short of pretending certainty.
The preserved evidence contains contradictions between older 166 material and 166 2.0 robotics/option statements. A proposed relationship-based compatibility dataset was drafted specifically to model revision- and date-scoped evidence such as this.
That proposal is not implemented. DJP Dolls therefore does not publish a universal compatibility matrix or a new compatibility ID system yet.
A live configurator checkbox is evidence that an option was offered in that context. It is not automatically proof of engineering compatibility across every revision of a similarly named body.
Materials, skeletons, and construction claims
Irontech publishes substantial material around silicone and TPE systems, skeleton revisions, hands, feet, canals, lightweight construction, standing systems, and related options.
Those claims are useful manufacturer evidence, but marketing names and feature labels are not converted into independent materials-science conclusions without technical documentation.
The research also preserves ULW / UWL naming inconsistency rather than silently deciding that one spelling is the universally correct engineering term.
Company and related-brand evidence
The canonical manufacturer identity is Irontech Doll, with official international and Chinese Irontech sites preserved in the research package.
Irontech’s public ecosystem has referenced names including Sigafun, Real Lady, and Erovenus. Exact legal ownership and relationship details are not equally strong for every name, so DJP Dolls does not flatten the whole ecosystem into one proven corporate structure.
Manufacturer history identifies Leonard / Leo as a founder figure, while separate corporate records expose other legal-person information. Those records should not be merged into one identity without evidence.
Sellers, authorization, and after-sales policy
Irontech is unusually useful here because it publishes a current first-party authorized-vendor system rather than forcing buyers to trust retailer badges alone.
The official page distinguishes general authorized vendors, Star Vendors, and an Exclusive Vendor/regional-agent category. A separate Snow Angel vendor page demonstrates that product-family authorization can be narrower than general brand authorization.
Exact-unit authenticity is a separate anti-fake check
Irontech also provides an anti-fake code system. The current Help/FAQ says each Irontech Doll comes with an anti-fake code in its manual and directs buyers to the manufacturer verification page.
Irontech’s dedicated anti-fake article explains that buyers can query authenticity using the code and explicitly frames the system as separate protection against counterfeit products.
That means DJP keeps two different trust questions:
- seller authorization: does Irontech currently recognize this retailer/domain for the relevant scope?
- exact-unit authenticity: does the physical product’s Irontech anti-fake code verify through the manufacturer system?
One does not replace the other.
Irontech’s direct-order workflow includes pre-shipment photo confirmation
Irontech’s current Help/FAQ says the manufacturer checks the completed doll, sends photos to the customer for confirmation after production, and arranges shipment after that stage.
That is useful evidence for the direct Irontech workflow. It is not automatic proof that every independent retailer uses the identical photo package, response deadline, or deemed-approval rule.
For the photo-review workflow, use How to Review Factory/QC Photos Before Your Doll Ships.
Irontech’s current public after-sales pages also use several different clocks and phrases that must not be collapsed into one fake warranty number.
The current return page asks buyers to report manufacturing defects or transit damage within 3 days of receipt. Robot/electric-function products have a separate 5-month after-sales service period from delivery. FAQ/contact copy separately uses the phrase lifetime service, but the captured wording does not define that as a lifetime free warranty.
The current public pages checked by DJP did not expose a clear six-month general physical-doll warranty term.
The same Help/FAQ recommends documenting the unboxing with photos or video and tells buyers to contact Irontech immediately if the doll arrives damaged. That delivery record should be preserved before cleaning or repair changes the received condition.
Use the Delivery and First Inspection Checklist for that arrival-evidence step.
Product photography should not be copied into DJP Dolls merely because it is publicly visible on a manufacturer or retailer page. The current research does not establish blanket media reuse permission.
Known gaps
The highest-value unresolved areas include authoritative suffix definitions, revision-specific weight standards, a formal body/head/option/robotics compatibility matrix, the 148 Plus / 148P boundary, complete corporate relationships among related brands, direct technical certificates and engineering reports, a fully normalized general physical-doll warranty field, and written media/image permission.
Leaving those gaps unresolved is preferable to presenting inferred values as established facts.
Evidence note
This page summarizes the current canonical Irontech identity layer and the preserved research package. Exact manufacturer tokens, conflicts, blank fields, revision differences, seller authorization, exact-unit authenticity, pre-shipment confirmation, after-sales scope, and unresolved policy evidence remain separate so that later technical or policy documents can improve the page without requiring DJP Dolls to rewrite history.
For the broader buyer workflow, see How to Verify Seller Authorization, Warranty, and After-Sales Terms, How to Review Factory/QC Photos Before Your Doll Ships, and the Delivery and First Inspection Checklist.