FIREDOLL in the DJP corpus means the Zhongshan manufacturer represented by firedoll.cn. That identity matters because several unrelated or loosely described products use similar “Fire” names online.
The current canonical layer contains 35 FIREDOLL body/form identities and 66 factory head identities. No body/head combinations were created in the first canonical slice because the preserved factory title rows were not strong enough to justify turning every observed presentation into a permanent exact pairing.
FIREDOLL is not Top Fire
The most important identity rule on this page is simple: FIREDOLL / Fire Doll and Top Fire Doll / 鼎火 are separate manufacturers unless first-party evidence establishes otherwise.
The Zhongshan FIREDOLL site uses firedoll.cn, numbered head identities such as #43 and #87, and height-plus-cup/body naming. Top Fire uses a different official site, different catalog grammar including T-codes, and its own ROS/authentication material.
DJP Dolls does not import Top Fire T-codes, ROS claims, patents, authentication language, or dealer identity into the FIREDOLL record merely because the English names look similar.
Factory body identities
The canonical migration preserves 35 defensible first-party FIREDOLL body/form tokens.
The factory’s catalog often encodes identity through height, cup/form text, and title-level tokens rather than a clean modern SKU system. Where a body appears with a suffix or prefix, DJP Dolls preserves the literal token instead of inventing a meaning for it.
There is no generic bare 166 identity in the canonical layer unless the factory evidence actually presents one. Similar-looking heights and title variants are not automatically collapsed.
Factory head identities
The current canonical layer preserves 66 exact factory head tokens.
FIREDOLL commonly uses numbered head forms such as #N, with additional observed forms such as #N-M and #SN. Those printed factory tokens are stronger identity evidence than names later supplied by a retailer.
Dealer theme names can still be useful aliases, but they do not replace the underlying factory head identity without evidence that FIREDOLL itself uses the name.
Why there is no giant combination table
The research harvest includes many title rows that visually or textually present a body with a head. That does not automatically establish a stable factory model identity for every row.
The first canonical migration therefore kept the body and head identities while declining to manufacture a bulk set of combinations from the 158 title rows. Exact combinations can be added later when the evidence supports treating a pairing as a durable product presentation rather than a catalog rendering or seller-style title.
Measurements and weights
Detailed first-party measurement coverage is thin compared with some other manufacturers in the corpus.
Seller and community tables may contain useful dimensions or weights, but those values are not promoted to factory specifications simply because the factory leaves a field blank. Missing first-party data remains missing first-party data.
This is especially important when similarly named bodies appear across dealers with different measurements, weights, or option packages.
Materials and product-system claims
The Zhongshan FIREDOLL site strongly emphasizes TPE and uses inconsistent English around material descriptions. DJP Dolls keeps that wording attributed instead of converting awkward marketing copy into a precise chemistry claim.
The public-web research also does not provide enough engineering detail to establish a complete skeleton-generation map, option-compatibility matrix, or universal meaning for every catalog suffix.
Company identity and facility evidence
The first-party FIREDOLL material supports Zhongshan, Guangdong and Henglan Town as part of the manufacturer’s public identity footprint.
Some street/address references conflict across captured material, and the current corpus does not have a sufficiently strong legal-entity / business-registration package to publish a complete corporate profile as settled fact.
A reviewer claim that FIREDOLL may have historical personnel or design links to WM remains a rumor/reviewer claim, not factory fact.
Sellers, authorization, and after-sales terms
No authoritative manufacturer-level vendor wall was established in the research pass.
A retailer calling itself authorized is evidence about what that retailer claims. It is not the same thing as FIREDOLL naming that retailer on a first-party authorization list or sending current written confirmation tied to that seller/domain.
The same separation applies to dealer specifications, dealer model names, dealer warranties, stock claims, production estimates, and shipping promises.
The current research also does not establish a complete first-party warranty/returns policy that can safely be generalized across FIREDOLL orders. That makes pre-purchase documentation particularly important when a seller is the main source for after-sales terms.
Known gaps
Important unresolved areas include the legal entity and registration details, named people, current street/factory details, complete measurement tables, skeleton and option engineering data, warranty/returns terms, affiliate terms, a manufacturer-verified vendor roster, media/image reuse permission, and any documented relationship to WM.
The catalog identity layer is useful without pretending those gaps are solved.
Evidence note
This page is based on the canonical FIREDOLL body/head migration plus the completed public-web research package. The strongest guardrail is identity separation: Zhongshan FIREDOLL stays separate from Top Fire, dealer naming stays separate from factory naming, and secondary measurements or commercial terms stay attributed rather than becoming factory truth.
For the general buyer workflow, see How to Verify Seller Authorization, Warranty, and After-Sales Terms and How to Verify a Doll Listing Before You Buy.